6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Cat delete= power; mpg; lower egt?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-05-2010 | 12:39 AM
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Cargo Master
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 6
From: Lubbock
Originally Posted by solaratomic
Man I'm old...lol
That's exactly what I just though. Lol
 
  #17  
Old 05-05-2010 | 01:11 AM
mackl1's Avatar
mackl1
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Oregon
For the sack of argument lets say I never have to worry about the emissions control cops, never, or am prepared to fix what ever needs to be fixed to get it passed if they ever do find it safe to come to my neck of the woods. First would it be a a good mod to gut the cat on a stock system? Not talking about going with a hole new 4" exhaust system with a cat delete and a better flow muffle because this is where I am eventually going after I get some other mods paid for first. Just want to know if the time is worth it. Basically if I can drop my EGT's by 100 degrees on the high end or get the EGT's to drop a little faster before I shut it down it would be worth it. Right now I have to keep my eye on the EGT while I am towing over 10,000 on steep grades don't like to put it much over 1300. Even though this may not be a high payoff Mod it's something to do while drinking a few beers but if its not worth the effort I will take care of some Honey do's.
 
  #18  
Old 05-05-2010 | 01:19 AM
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Cargo Master
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 6
From: Lubbock
What tunes are you running while towing that weight? What I have seen and heard from comments made by users is that a 3" straight pipe is a improvement from stock and comparible to a 4" system. So basically ditch the cat and muff be cause both will give the biggest gain.
 
  #19  
Old 05-05-2010 | 01:36 AM
mackl1's Avatar
mackl1
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Oregon
The tunes will be future SCT tunes because of the planned EGR delete on the MY 2005. But the 3 1/2 down pipe and 4" back with a cat delete and high flow muffle will be in my future before the EGR delete and the SCT tunes. I have to keep the muffle for the neighbors and the wife. Anyway this won't probably come until the end of the summer. Just thinking about what I can do cheap before the summer heat and much towing I will see over the next 2 of 3 months. Thanks
 
  #20  
Old 05-05-2010 | 01:29 PM
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Cargo Master
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 6
From: Lubbock
Get a muff delete pipe and see how loud it is. I've heard a few 6.0's that were not to loud for a straight pipe. I will probably do a muff delete at some point but I want to be able to put it back in if I needed to later.
 
  #21  
Old 05-05-2010 | 02:24 PM
MacbooknMyTruck's Avatar
MacbooknMyTruck
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Lubbockguy1979
100-maybe 200 degree drop in egts on a stock exhaust and gutted cat. You can faintly hear the turbo at idle. Overall noise is not really much difference. No big gains in mpg. Might have gotten 1mpg but that is not great enough to proclaim a gain in my book. Loosing the muffler is next on the list st some point. Knocking a hole in the ceramic is pointless. Unless your truck is running terrible is should pass a sniffer. Also unless they either run a camera or pull the cat there is no way they will be able to prove it was gutted. Worst case they fail you for opacy or something else. Visually though it is there. Proving it is not functioning or altered will be extremely difficult.
Man, I have sompletely stock exhaust with muffler and cat intact, and I can still hear my '03 turbo at idle
 
  #22  
Old 05-05-2010 | 02:43 PM
Lubbockguy1979's Avatar
Lubbockguy1979
Cargo Master
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 6
From: Lubbock
I can hear the turbo at idle out side of the truck. It is not that loud though pretty faint.
 
  #23  
Old 05-05-2010 | 03:02 PM
mnmwhit's Avatar
mnmwhit
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 988
Likes: 1
From: North Pole Alaska
Originally Posted by gearloose1
The amount of restriction from a properly working CAT is there, but not really that large - much more restriction comes from the muffler, which you cannot remove.

Remember that the diesel flows the same amount of air regardless of throttle, (though the amount of exhaust increases with larger throttle because of thermal expansion and combustion creating more gases), so there is less to be gained from upgrading the exhaust vs. the gas.

If the Cat is constricted (clogged by particles), there is the problem.

The best "mod" is to put a large hole (about tube diameter) down the middle without taking out the cat and without damaging the ceramic enough to cause the cat to rattle.

That way, it technically still passes the smog test requirement (there is a functioning cat), but the restriction is nearly all gone.
Alot of folks remove thier muffler. That is actually pretty common with guys on this site. I went with an MBRP exhaust.

If you dont immisions test where you are kill the CAT
 
  #24  
Old 05-05-2010 | 03:55 PM
lakewood's Avatar
lakewood
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 3
From: Bradenton, FL
I can hear my turbo inside my truck when idling, when i pass buildings with my windows down at about 2k rpm's, my turbo makes my ears my hurt, i dont know how to describe how loud it is, the video doesnt even do justice, i need to record a better one.
 
  #25  
Old 05-05-2010 | 10:07 PM
mackl1's Avatar
mackl1
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Oregon
Since I am going with a 4" exhaust a little later I didn't want to waste the money on a cat delete pipe or a pipe to delete the muffler but looks like they are around 50 bucks so thinking I will get one and save the cat. Maybe I can sell it later to someone that thought the emission control cops would never come but did Any thing that will stand a chance of dropping my egt's down a little over some expected heavy hauling this summer would probably be a good thing.
 
  #26  
Old 05-06-2010 | 08:19 AM
MacbooknMyTruck's Avatar
MacbooknMyTruck
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by lakewood
I can hear my turbo inside my truck when idling, when i pass buildings with my windows down at about 2k rpm's, my turbo makes my ears my hurt, i dont know how to describe how loud it is, the video doesnt even do justice, i need to record a better one.
Yeah I can hear mine inside the truck at idle. I can't wait to get my 4" straight pipe installed, I do believe without the CAT and Muffler my turbo is gonna scream!!! It is already pretty loud.

I'll make sure to post a video
 
  #27  
Old 05-06-2010 | 03:46 PM
Gental Ben 2's Avatar
Gental Ben 2
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
This is all great stuff but back to my original question: Cat delete= power; mpg; lower egt.
From what I'm seeingower gain - barely measurable on a stock system; mpg gain-not worth the effort; lower EGT- the winner.
Even a 100 degree drop from what I've read can make the difference between EGR system failure or not when towing/summer heat.
Am also correct that the factory muffler is the bigger 'plugger' and that either a strait pipe (if I can handle the noise) or a high-flow muff will do more good.
At present I am all stock (2005; 62K) and would prefer to keep the cat (because my kids need to breath on this planet after I'm gone) and try a back of system mod.
These are super clean engines to start with so i am still a bit hung up on the need for a cat. My fuel is also very good up here in Canada (Shell V Power).
Does anybody know how much the cat actually cleans up the exhaust and once they 'plug up' are they designed to just become a flow through pipe anyway???
Thanks for all the input to date!
 
  #28  
Old 05-09-2010 | 09:42 AM
Gental Ben 2's Avatar
Gental Ben 2
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Seems I stumped the collective.....let me rephrase my main question:
compared to the old 7.3 that belched blake smoke and the 6.0 that looks clean out the tail pipe-will removing the cat make it puff black?
 
  #29  
Old 05-09-2010 | 10:28 AM
mojo1's Avatar
mojo1
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: in the fast lane
Does anybody know how much the cat actually cleans up the exhaust and once they 'plug up' are they designed to just become a flow through pipe anyway???
Thanks for all the input to date![/quote]

The cat does not become a flow through pipe, It has two screens in it that has alot of small holes in it.

My truck is straighted piped, the only real differance is the sound and lower egts. No smoke at all.
 
  #30  
Old 05-11-2010 | 04:04 PM
fireman660r's Avatar
fireman660r
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 1
From: South central kansas
I have a pretty good way to settle this question. My neighbor has an '05 just like mine. We both have 4" MBRP exhausts. I still have my factory cat in mine, he does not. I have the 3.5" downpipe also. The only thing stock on my exhaust is the cat. His truck has a significantly louder whistle than mine. Mine has a loud whistle too, just not as loud. If I pull a steep grade towing 10k plus I never break 1100 degrees. EVER. I was told by my Ford tech that a stock cat flows 2% less than a straight pipe. There is some required backpressure to stop the turbo from overboosting. The stock turbo is meant to peak at 27lbs of boost. Anything over that can cause problems. I get good enough mpg's to impress most people. 17 on average, 19 if I burn the tank on highway in one non stop trip. Good enough for me, beats the 14 I was getting when I bought the truck. I think it is really just a personal preference, if you want more noise get rid of the cat. I also left my cat in to protect myself from Ford if I had any emissions warranty claims. Just something to think about.
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.