We Own Work: My 2017 Super Duty Experience
#1156
Exactly! A lot of us have to do our own work and haul our own pellets and firewood simply so we can afford these trucks!
The payloads on the F250 are very disappointing. I always would haul a 1 ton pallet of pellets in my F150 Screw....handles just fine across the 12 miles trip I would make. But I sure was hoping to see a 2500 +/- payload on a F250, gasser, SCab, LB. Prolly not gonna happen.
The payloads on the F250 are very disappointing. I always would haul a 1 ton pallet of pellets in my F150 Screw....handles just fine across the 12 miles trip I would make. But I sure was hoping to see a 2500 +/- payload on a F250, gasser, SCab, LB. Prolly not gonna happen.
#1157
With all of that, yes the Michelin is the better all terrain tire. I have made multiple trips from Dearborn to Phoenix for winter testing and when I wasn't driving our F-450 towing trailers, i'll be in a F-350 SRW and usually have it fitted with 20" Michelins incase I encounter snow (Which happens frequently).
#1158
Remember (re: highway and M+S) One size fits all, fits no-one.
#1160
245/75R17 Michelin either an AT or AS depending on the package for a 350 DRW
#1165
M300 under a DRW 350. Learned today that it will have two versions. A light duty and a heavy duty version. The LD version will ride in the 350 DRW pickups and C&C trucks. The HD version is for the 450 pickup and chassis cabs from 450 to 550. The Dana 80, 110 and 130 are retired for the moment.
#1167
#1168
Nope - you can just make out a current-gen Super Duty, XL Trim, just peaking out from behind the outhouse.
Where's the abuse? I only see some driving on dirt.
LCR, that makes no sense. A homeowner with a pellet stove needs to buy a "work truck" version of an F-250 because his loaded F-250 isn't capable of hauling a ton of wood pellets? I'm sure even at 2,000lbs payload it could still do it, just seems awful low for a 250 considering F-150 ratings.
Where's the abuse? I only see some driving on dirt.
LCR, that makes no sense. A homeowner with a pellet stove needs to buy a "work truck" version of an F-250 because his loaded F-250 isn't capable of hauling a ton of wood pellets? I'm sure even at 2,000lbs payload it could still do it, just seems awful low for a 250 considering F-150 ratings.
I tend to respectfully disagree with that statement. Thousands of people in the north heat with pellets and I believe the idea of a pallet of pellets was being used for example. Thousands heat with wood and use their "nice" trucks for cutting and hauling firewood. And thousands of northerners replace their own roofs, build their own buildings and do lots of things with their "nice" F-250's. There are also many with "nice" F-350's who never roll back their tonneau or pull a trailer.
The point being made is the payload on the example F-250 is surprisingly small and almost overlaps the F-150 which I believe is only a fraction the truck of the super duty. "We Own Work" is a tall statement and many expected increases across the board. And even if the truck cannot haul a 1 ton pallet, more than half of that weight should be within reason.
The point being made is the payload on the example F-250 is surprisingly small and almost overlaps the F-150 which I believe is only a fraction the truck of the super duty. "We Own Work" is a tall statement and many expected increases across the board. And even if the truck cannot haul a 1 ton pallet, more than half of that weight should be within reason.
The official answer is Vehicle weight vs. GVWR. If a f150 has a a GVWR of 7600 and weighs 5200 that leaves a payload of 2400. If a F250 has a GVWR of 10000 and weighs 8000 you have a payload of 2000. Its really that simple and I don't see why this discussion always comes up. If you want a crewcab F250 that hauls 3000lbs, they do make those, go buy one.
#1169