1974 302 oil pan front sump

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-26-2012 | 12:08 AM
Dwinn's Avatar
Dwinn
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Oxnard CA
1974 302 oil pan front sump

Picked up a 74' F100 with a 302. Apparently the engine is not the original. The casting number is D4DE-6015-BA with a date code of 4L20. My internet search says this is probably a pssenger car engine that may have come from a Maverick or similar auto. The engine has a front sump oil pan, with the dipstick at the front of the engine, and I noticed that the drain plug sits over the i-beam, which is hard to get to. I saw some posts on the internet about differences, or pros/cons, of front and rear sump pans, but was wondering if there's a front sump pan with a drain plug on the side, or on the curve of the sump, or on the front of the sump to make it easier to drain the oil.
 
  #2  
Old 07-26-2012 | 08:33 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Post Fiend
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 16
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by Dwinn
Picked up a 74' F100 with a 302. Apparently the engine is not the original. The casting number is D4DE-6015-BA with a date code of 4L20. My internet search says this is probably a pssenger car engine that may have come from a Maverick or similar auto. The engine has a front sump oil pan, with the dipstick at the front of the engine, and I noticed that the drain plug sits over the i-beam, which is hard to get to. I saw some posts on the internet about differences, or pros/cons, of front and rear sump pans, but was wondering if there's a front sump pan with a drain plug on the side, or on the curve of the sump, or on the front of the sump to make it easier to drain the oil.
Once again, another erroneous assumption based on the "D" in the casting number. The third character in no way is an indication as to what vehicle any Ford part was installed in at the factory. The date code you listed tells me that there's a 99% chance it's the original engine to your truck. It's supposed to have a front sump oilpan and matching dipstick. The apparent difficulty accessing the drain plug is normal. Ford regularly used parts whose engineering costs that were assigned to different vehicle lines, other than those that the third character indicates. The 86 and 87-95 5.0 HO (E6SE & E7TE) heads are a prime example of this, as are the engine blocks found in these cars. None have a Mustang third character in their casting numbers
 
  #3  
Old 07-26-2012 | 09:59 AM
Dwinn's Avatar
Dwinn
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Oxnard CA
I still question the engine's originality. My 74' F100 was not equipped with air conditioning, but the engine has the mounting bracket for the A/C pump and an extra groove on the crank pulley. I haven't check the model numbers yet, but it appears the trans is also different. But my post question was whether or not there was a different oil pan I could swap to to make it easer to change the oil.
 
  #4  
Old 07-26-2012 | 07:59 PM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Post Fiend
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 16
From: south louisiana
Someone may have started an A/C installation in the past. As for the oil pan, if it holds 6 qts with the filter, it's the correct pan. Car's held 5 qts, trucks held 6
 
  #5  
Old 07-16-2013 | 10:35 PM
Dwinn's Avatar
Dwinn
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Oxnard CA
Been busy this past year. Still trying to get to the 74 F100. Does anyone have a picture of a 74 or 70's, six quart oil pan? I'm still of the notion that the engine in it now was a car engine instead of a truck engine. I wonder if there is other physical features for the stock 74 F100 302 that would help me determine if it's a car or truck engine.
 
  #6  
Old 07-17-2013 | 09:06 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Post Fiend
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 16
From: south louisiana
There's no difference between a car and truck engine as far as block, heads, crank, rods,etc. The oilpan is just about the only thing different as far as a 70's 302 goes.
 
  #7  
Old 07-19-2013 | 11:42 PM
51dueller's Avatar
51dueller
Lead Driver
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 11
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
Here's a picture of the 1969-79 truck oil pan:
 
  #8  
Old 07-20-2013 | 08:40 AM
Dwinn's Avatar
Dwinn
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Oxnard CA
51dueller - Thank you very much for the picture. I'll have to go out and look again at my 302 oil pan. Do you know if that's a 6 quart pan? I think someone said 6 quart is a truck pan and 5 quart is a car pan. Thanks again for the picture.
 
  #9  
Old 07-20-2013 | 09:18 AM
51dueller's Avatar
51dueller
Lead Driver
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 11
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
That's the 6 quart pan. The 5 quart car pan has the front sump slightly shorter and the drain plug points to the side of the pan on a little raised area.
 
  #10  
Old 07-20-2013 | 07:52 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 32,796
Likes: 1,950
Club FTE Gold Member
Solve your problem for $25.

5 or 6 quarts is not an issue, the 302 will be happy with 5.

Search results :: Qwik Valve
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tluns
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
01-06-2018 01:58 PM
bkaul
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
03-17-2015 05:13 PM
GeorgiaVol
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
10-24-2011 07:19 AM
THAT.GUY
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
10-19-2009 02:12 PM
84tealbeast
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
7
09-14-2006 08:32 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.